April 7, 2003
Dear Parent or Guardian:
On
January 8, 2002, President Bush signed the No
Child Left Behind Act of 2001 into law.
The law calls for sweeping changes in public education. Among these is a
new federal requirement that all states and school districts in receipt of Title
I assistance must, by 2003, issue annual “report cards” to parents. The
purpose of the report card is to give parents information about their child’s
school in terms of academic achievement and the professional qualifications of
its teachers. By making this
information available each year, parents will learn how their school is doing,
what its goals are, and what they can do to work more effectively with their
teachers and administrators. In
addition to sharing good news, the report card helps parents make informed
decisions about what to do in the event that their school is determined to be
“in need of improvement,” based on annual test results, such as the
Massachusetts Comprehensive Achievement System (MCAS).
Part
I: Teacher Qualifications
Part
II: School Achievement in Mathematics and Reading
Part
III: School Performance Ratings
Part I
provides information about the qualifications of the teachers on our faculty.
The information is divided into two parts: (1) the percentage of teachers
who are certified or licensed to teach in Massachusetts and (2) the percentage
of classes taught by teachers who are highly qualified in core academic areas
such as mathematics, science, reading, history, English language arts, etc. Both
pieces of information are intended to help you understand the backgrounds and
preparation of the teachers who are working with your child.
As you will see, most if not all teachers in the school are certified,
and most, if not all, are highly qualified. Those who are not are either working
on a waiver granted by the Massachusetts Department of Education, or are
long-term or permanent substitutes. While
qualified to teach within Massachusetts, certain teachers are now in the
process of demonstrating subject matter competency through additional
coursework. No Child Left Behind
requires that all teachers be highly qualified by the end of the 2005-2006
school year, and thus what you will see in the percentages are indications of
how far our school has to go in order to comply with this deadline.
No
Child Left Behind requires that test results for reading and mathematics be
reported annually. The information
contained in Part II summarizes how we did on the last round of MCAS
examinations. The data is broken
down by grade level, subject area, and the performances of different subgroups,
or learning populations in the school such as limited English proficient
students or students with disabilities. This
information is similar to what you received about your child’s MCAS scores in
November. Now these data have been
added together to provide a snapshot of how the students in our school have
performed as a whole.
Part
III provides information about how well our school is doing relative to others
in the district and to its performance in past years.
The “Proficiency Index” (PI) scores for Mathematics and English
Language Arts are part of Massachusetts’ School Performance Rating system.
This system has been set up to comply with the accountability provisions
of No Child Left Behind which require, among other things, that each school make
adequate yearly progress (AYP) toward meeting a national goal of all students
being “proficient” in mathematics and English by the year 2013-2014.
The Proficiency scores and AYP ratings in the student achievement data
are meant to signal whether or not our school is on target to meet this goal or
whether it has fallen behind and is “in need of improvement.”
The information describing our school’s performance
shows that we have not made AYP for Grade 7/8 mathematics and
English Language Arts for 2 consecutive years.
Therefore we are “in need of improvement.”
This
school report card is designed to help you be an informed consumer.
A complete district report card for our school system is
also now available for you to review. It
may be found at the Superintendent’s Office, at our school’s office, in our
Town library, or on our district’s website at winchendonk12.org.
In
closing, please know that we are prepared to help you further should you have
more questions about what this report card means and how you can use it to help
you and your child grow stronger academically.
Please feel free to call me directly if I can be of additional assistance
to you.
Also, we are planning an evening session for all parents on Tuesday, April 29, 2003 at 7:00 PM
at Murdock Middle/High School auditorium in order that we can explain this
new provision of this initiative to reform America’s schools.
I look
forward to meeting and talking with you then.
Sincerely
yours,
Patricia
A. Washburn
Principal
Murdock Middle/High (03430505)Patricia A Washburn, School PrincipalMailing Address: 3 Memorial Dr Winchendon, MA 01475-1198 Phone: (978) 297-1256 FAX: (978) 297-0509 Website: http://www.winchendonk12.org/ |
Report Card:
This report includes information on the school's performance on the
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) by content area, grade
level, and for particular student populations. Comparison data from the
district, the state, and from 2001 are also provided. In addition, this report
includes other information as required by the federal No Child Left Behind
act.
Mission Statement:
Our mission at Murdock Middle/High School is primarily to teach our
students to be knowledgeable and responsible citizens. It is also to guide them
in becoming lifelong learners, effective communicators and problem solvers.
Students will be encouraged to value diversity and to practice healthy
lifestyles. To accomplish this mission, our school will maintain a safe and
stimulating environment.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Participation | % Students at Each Performance Level | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | % | A | P | NI | W/F | |
| STUDENT STATUS | ||||||
| Regular | 132 | 100 | 2 | 61 | 33 | 3 |
| Disabled | 31 | 100 | 0 | 6 | 55 | 39 |
| GENDER | ||||||
| Female | 88 | 100 | 3 | 59 | 35 | 2 |
| Male | 75 | 100 | 0 | 41 | 40 | 19 |
| RACE/ETHNICITY | ||||||
| African American/Black | 2 | 100 | ||||
| Asian or Pacific Islander | 1 | 100 | ||||
| Hispanic | 1 | 100 | ||||
| Mixed or Other | 10 | 100 | 0 | 60 | 20 | 20 |
| White | 149 | 100 | 2 | 51 | 38 | 9 |
| FREE LUNCH | 38 | 100 | 0 | 53 | 29 | 18 |
| ALL STUDENTS | ||||||
| 2002 | 163 | 100 | 2 | 51 | 37 | 10 |
| 2001 | 162 | 98 | 0 | 30 | 54 | 17 |
| DISTRICT | ||||||
| 2002 | 166 | 100 | 2 | 50 | 38 | 10 |
| 2001 | 162 | 98 | 0 | 30 | 54 | 17 |
| STATE | ||||||
| 2002 | 76710 | 97 | 9 | 55 | 28 | 8 |
| NOTE: MCAS results for groups with fewer than 10 students are not shown to protect student confidentiality | ||||||
![]() |
| Participation | % Students at Each Performance Level | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | % | A | P | NI | W/F | |
| STUDENT STATUS | ||||||
| Regular | 129 | 100 | 2 | 16 | 43 | 40 |
| Disabled | 37 | 97 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 84 |
| Limited English Proficient | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| GENDER | ||||||
| Female | 83 | 99 | 2 | 10 | 37 | 51 |
| Male | 83 | 99 | 1 | 16 | 35 | 48 |
| RACE/ETHNICITY | ||||||
| African American/Black | 1 | 100 | ||||
| Asian or Pacific Islander | 2 | 100 | ||||
| Hispanic | 6 | 100 | ||||
| Mixed or Other | 12 | 100 | 0 | 17 | 25 | 58 |
| White | 145 | 99 | 2 | 12 | 39 | 47 |
| FREE LUNCH | 40 | 100 | 0 | 8 | 20 | 73 |
| ALL STUDENTS | ||||||
| 2002 | 166 | 99 | 2 | 13 | 36 | 49 |
| 2001 | 150 | 98 | 3 | 17 | 41 | 39 |
| DISTRICT | ||||||
| 2002 | 170 | 99 | 2 | 12 | 35 | 51 |
| 2001 | 150 | 98 | 3 | 17 | 41 | 39 |
| STATE | ||||||
| 2002 | 74890 | 98 | 11 | 23 | 33 | 33 |
| NOTE: MCAS results for groups with fewer than 10 students are not shown to protect student confidentiality | ||||||
| Adequate Yearly Performance of School | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gr | Subj | Base PI | Imp. Target | Cycle II PI | Perf. Rating | Imp. Rating | AYP 99 | AYP 00 | AYP 01 | AYP 02 |
| 7/8 | ELA | 76.3 | + 3.4 | 78.2 | Moderate | On Target | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| 7/8 | MTH | 50.4 | + 7.1 | 49.7 | Very Low | No Change | Y | Y | N | N |
![]() |
| Participation | % Students at Each Performance Level | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | % | A | P | NI | W/F | |
| STUDENT STATUS | ||||||
| Regular | 106 | 95 | 13 | 55 | 27 | 5 |
| Disabled | 14 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 79 |
| GENDER | ||||||
| Female | 60 | 97 | 15 | 43 | 27 | 15 |
| Male | 60 | 95 | 8 | 53 | 27 | 12 |
| RACE/ETHNICITY | ||||||
| African American/Black | 3 | 100 | ||||
| Asian or Pacific Islander | 3 | 100 | ||||
| Hispanic | 5 | 100 | ||||
| Mixed or Other | 9 | 90 | ||||
| Native American | 1 | 50 | ||||
| White | 99 | 97 | 12 | 47 | 26 | 14 |
| FREE LUNCH | 20 | 87 | 5 | 30 | 20 | 45 |
| ALL STUDENTS | ||||||
| 2002 | 120 | 96 | 12 | 48 | 27 | 13 |
| 2001 | 115 | 93 | 5 | 42 | 39 | 14 |
| DISTRICT | ||||||
| 2002 | 122 | 96 | 11 | 48 | 27 | 14 |
| 2001 | 115 | 93 | 5 | 42 | 39 | 14 |
| STATE | ||||||
| 2002 | 65669 | 96 | 20 | 40 | 27 | 13 |
| NOTE: MCAS results for groups with fewer than 10 students are not shown to protect student confidentiality | ||||||
| Adequate Yearly Performance of School | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gr | Subj | Base PI | Imp. Target | Cycle II PI | Perf. Rating | Imp. Rating | AYP 99 | AYP 00 | AYP 01 | AYP 02 |
| 10 | ELA | 59.5 | + 5.8 | 76.6 | Moderate | Above Target | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| 10 | MTH | 40.4 | + 8.5 | 62.8 | Low | Above Target | Y | Y | Y | Y |
![]() |
| Participation | % Students at Each Performance Level | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | % | A | P | NI | W/F | |
| STUDENT STATUS | ||||||
| Regular | 111 | 100 | 13 | 24 | 39 | 24 |
| Disabled | 13 | 93 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 92 |
| GENDER | ||||||
| Female | 62 | 100 | 11 | 13 | 47 | 29 |
| Male | 62 | 98 | 11 | 31 | 24 | 34 |
| RACE/ETHNICITY | ||||||
| African American/Black | 3 | 100 | ||||
| Asian or Pacific Islander | 3 | 100 | ||||
| Hispanic | 5 | 100 | ||||
| Mixed or Other | 10 | 100 | 0 | 20 | 40 | 40 |
| Native American | 2 | 100 | ||||
| White | 101 | 99 | 13 | 25 | 33 | 30 |
| FREE LUNCH | 23 | 100 | 9 | 9 | 26 | 57 |
| ALL STUDENTS | ||||||
| 2002 | 124 | 99 | 11 | 22 | 35 | 31 |
| 2001 | 118 | 95 | 7 | 35 | 29 | 30 |
| DISTRICT | ||||||
| 2002 | 126 | 99 | 11 | 22 | 35 | 32 |
| 2001 | 118 | 95 | 7 | 35 | 29 | 30 |
| STATE | ||||||
| 2002 | 66674 | 97 | 20 | 24 | 31 | 25 |
| NOTE: MCAS results for groups with fewer than 10 students are not shown to protect student confidentiality | ||||||
| Adequate Yearly Performance of School | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gr | Subj | Base PI | Imp. Target | Cycle II PI | Perf. Rating | Imp. Rating | AYP 99 | AYP 00 | AYP 01 | AYP 02 |
| 10 | ELA | 59.5 | + 5.8 | 76.6 | Moderate | Above Target | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| 10 | MTH | 40.4 | + 8.5 | 62.8 | Low | Above Target | Y | Y | Y | Y |
![]() |